Court Ruling Restores Concession for Parrilladas Macul Limitada

Marek Sadowski
Marek Sadowski
Reports on procurement law, review decisions and how the rules change. Based in Warsaw.
3 Min Read

This article examines the implications of a recent court ruling on public procurement processes in Chile.

Background of the Case

The case centres around Parrilladas Macul Limitada, a company controlled by Gladys González Núñez, known as “La Cuca”. In 2007, the company was awarded a 30-year concession to operate the Centre of Events and Restaurant at Parque Municipal San Luis Orione. However, in 2021, the Municipality of Cerrillos terminated this contract prematurely, claiming various breaches. This decision led to legal action, with the company arguing that the municipality had acted outside its authority.

The Court’s Decision

On 31 July 2026, Judge Claudia Donoso Niemeyer of the 18th Civil Court of Santiago ruled in favour of Parrilladas Macul Limitada, declaring the municipality’s termination of the concession contract null and void. The court found that the mayor had failed to obtain the necessary prior approval from the Municipal Council, as required by law. This ruling not only reinstated the original contract but also dismissed the municipality’s counterclaim for damages amounting to $300 million, which had been based on alleged breaches by the concessionaire.

Implications for Public Procurement

The ruling highlights the importance of adhering to legal protocols in public procurement processes. It serves as a reminder that municipal authorities must operate within the bounds of their legal authority and cannot unilaterally terminate contracts without due process. The court’s decision reinforces the principle that public administration must comply with established laws, potentially setting a precedent for future cases involving concession agreements and municipal contracts.

Future Considerations

While the ruling is a significant victory for Parrilladas Macul Limitada, it does not preclude the municipality from pursuing future claims for damages or contract enforcement, provided they follow the correct legal procedures. The case underscores the complexities of public procurement and the need for transparency and compliance in municipal decision-making. As the matter may proceed to the Court of Appeals, further developments are anticipated that could further clarify the legal landscape surrounding public concessions in Chile.

IN NUMBERS

The recent court ruling not only reinstates a significant concession but also reinforces the legal framework governing public procurement, emphasising the necessity for compliance by municipal authorities.


Reported from latercera.com, 2026-08-14. The Tender Wire is published by Otnox.

Share This Article
Reports on procurement law, review decisions and how the rules change. Based in Warsaw.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *