Buyer File: SAVE S.P.A.

SAVE S.P.A. advertised 9535529 EUR through 129 distinct notices in the last 180 days. The figures describe planned or available procurement, not completed purchases: the listing records 0 awards. Most notices were modest in value, while a Venice Airport gateway project accounted for the largest advertised requirement.

Advertised demand is not awarded work

Across the last 180 days, SAVE S.P.A. published 129 distinct notices with a combined advertised value of 9535529 EUR. That is a pipeline of invitations and ceilings, not evidence that suppliers received contracts: the listing records 0 awards, and 0% of awards name a winner. The distinction matters for bidders assessing available work. A notice can describe a requirement, reserve a framework ceiling or set terms for competition; an award identifies the outcome. Repeated framework ceilings have been counted once, so the notice count is not a count of every publication or every possible call-off. Businesses reading the total should therefore treat it as advertised opportunity attached to SAVE S.P.A., not booked revenue.

A small median sits below one major project

The median notice was 17350 EUR, well below the 2431223 EUR advertised for “GARA SERVIZI DI INGEGNERIA COSTRUZIONE NUOVO GATEWAY DHL AEROPORTO DI VENEZIA”. This gap indicates that the headline total combines routine purchasing with at least one large, specialised requirement. Category shares point to a mixed supplier base: Architecture & Engineering Services accounts for 20%, Industrial Machinery for 12%, and Electrical Equipment for 11%. For businesses, the practical lesson is to match tender monitoring to capability and contract size rather than judge the opportunity from the aggregate alone. A specialist engineering firm and an equipment supplier may be looking at the same buyer through different notices.

Deadlines are visible, outcomes are not

The listing shows that 98% of notices had a published deadline, while 0 notices were open now. That combination gives businesses a useful timing signal: the advertised opportunities largely carried a stated closing point, but none remained available at the time represented. It also limits what can be concluded about competition. With 0 awards and 0 distinct winners recorded, these figures cannot show which suppliers succeeded, whether requirements were retendered or how many bids were received. A repeat win or a single bid, if later observed in award information, would be a market condition to examine rather than evidence of impropriety. Award data is needed before assessing supplier concentration or contract outcomes.

Data: Otnox — live procurement intelligence across 56 markets. Basis: 129 distinct priced notices and 0 awards published by SAVE S.P.A. in the last 180 days, 2026-04-04..2026-10-01.