MTC-PROYECTO ESPECIAL DE INFRAESTRUCTURA DE TRANSPORTE DESCENTRALIZADO – PROVIAS DESCENTRALIZADO advertised 1049137913 PEN across 19 notices in the last 60 days. That places it above the other buyers ranked by advertised value, but the figure describes planned procurement rather than money awarded. For businesses, the useful distinction is between the scale of a buyer’s notice pipeline and the number, size and structure of the opportunities within it.
A large buyer total does not mean one large contract
PROVIAS accounts for 9.4% of the total used to rank 8 buyers, with 1049137913 PEN advertised across 19 notices. Its largest single notice was 371639554, titled RES-PROC-1-2026-MTC/21-OXI-1. The comparison with other buyers matters because advertised value can be distributed in very different ways. GOBIERNO REGIONAL DE PASCO SEDE CENTRAL advertised 851740004 PEN across 31 notices, while GOBIERNO REGIONAL DE PIURA – GERENCIA SUBREGIONAL LUCIANO CASTILLO COLONNA advertised 783580345 PEN across 3 notices. A supplier assessing market access therefore needs to examine both the buyer total and the opportunity structure: a high aggregate can reflect several procurements or a smaller number of much larger ones.
Notice counts change how the ranking should be read
The ranking shows why advertised value and notice volume should be read together. PROVIAS combined 1049137913 PEN with 19 notices, whereas Ucayali combined 244078088 PEN with 41 notices. Piura’s 783580345 PEN was spread across 3 notices, and its largest single notice was 782247942. Tocache advertised 353247789 PEN in 1 notice, with the largest single value also 353247789. The procurement mechanism behind these figures is aggregation: each notice represents a separate advertised opportunity, while the buyer total brings them together for comparison. That makes notice-level review important for identifying whether a market is divided into lots, repeated works or a single major requirement.
| Buyer | Advertised | Notices | Largest single |
|---|---|---|---|
| MTC-PROYECTO ESPECIAL DE INFRAESTRUCTURA DE TRANSPORTE DESCE | 1,049,137,913 PEN | 19 | 371,639,554 PEN |
| GOBIERNO REGIONAL DE PASCO SEDE CENTRAL | 851,740,004 PEN | 31 | 208,106,781 PEN |
| GOBIERNO REGIONAL DE PIURA – GERENCIA SUBREGIONAL LUCIANO CA | 783,580,345 PEN | 3 | 782,247,942 PEN |
| AUTORIDAD NACIONAL DE INFRAESTRUCTURA | 504,548,909 PEN | 13 | 209,053,252 PEN |
| MUNICIPALIDAD PROVINCIAL DE TOCACHE | 353,247,789 PEN | 1 | 353,247,789 PEN |
| GOBIERNO REGIONAL DE UCAYALI SEDE CENTRAL | 244,078,088 PEN | 41 | 46,009,321 PEN |
| SEGURO SOCIAL DE SALUD | 198,040,904 PEN | 63 | 72,696,000 PEN |
| GOBIERNO REGIONAL DE AYACUCHO SEDE CENTRAL | 162,835,708 PEN | 41 | 98,467,265 PEN |
Advertised value is not an award outcome
The figures describe notices, not the results of competition. They do not establish how many bids each notice received, which firms won, whether a contract was signed or what final price was agreed. That is especially important when comparing buyers with different notice counts, such as PROVIAS at 19 notices and Seguro Social de Salud at 63 notices. Businesses reviewing the opportunities should distinguish the advertised requirement from later tender and award information, then check the scope, eligibility rules, timetable and contract conditions for each notice. A single bid or a repeat win, if later observed, would be a market condition to examine rather than evidence of impropriety on its own.
WHY IT MATTERS
The buyer ranking identifies where advertised value is concentrated, but notice counts show how that value reaches the market. PROVIAS’s 19 notices and largest single value of 371639554 require a different bidding review from a buyer with 1 notice worth 353247789.
Data: Otnox — live procurement intelligence across 56 markets. Basis: 5,566 distinct priced PE notices from the last 60 days, with repeated framework ceilings counted once, 2026-04-02..2026-09-29.
