Rocket Lab challenges Blue Origin’s NASA Mars contract award

Marek Sadowski
Marek Sadowski
Reports on procurement law, review decisions and how the rules change. Based in Warsaw.
4 Min Read

What does Rocket Lab’s protest allege about NASA’s process for awarding the Mars Telecommunications Network contract?

NASA selected Blue Origin for the Mars network

NASA awarded Blue Origin a contract worth up to approximately $700 million in early September, after issuing a request for proposals in May. The work covers designing, developing, integrating, launching and operating a Mars Telecommunications Orbiter. The spacecraft is intended, among other functions, to act as a communications relay for missions to Mars. The award therefore concerns an enabling service for future missions rather than a standalone scientific payload. Rocket Lab, which also competed for the work, has now challenged the agency’s decision through a formal protest to the Government Accountability Office, or GAO.

The challenge concerns eligibility and technical scoring

Rocket Lab’s protest alleges that NASA’s award decision may not comply with eligibility criteria mandated by Congress. The company also says the agency’s review of its technical volume was punitive and relied on incorrect assertions and conclusions. Those are Rocket Lab’s allegations, not established findings: the source reports no GAO decision and provides no evidence that NASA breached the rules. The mechanism matters because a formal GAO protest gives an unsuccessful bidder a defined channel for contesting an agency’s award decision and asking for scrutiny of the evaluation. The challenge does not, in the information available here, resolve the contract’s merits.

The rivals have met in earlier NASA competitions

The dispute follows earlier friction between the companies and NASA. In 2025, Rocket Lab criticised the agency’s rejection of its Mars Sample Return proposal, which included a Mars communications orbiter, while saying it supported an open competition. Blue Origin itself filed a GAO protest in 2021 after NASA selected SpaceX to develop the next lunar lander, alongside other responses including discounts and litigation. That challenge did not succeed. Blue Origin later won a separate competition and, in 2023, was selected as NASA’s second Artemis lunar lander provider in a contract worth $3.4 billion.

Blue Origin says the hardware is being prepared

Blue Origin’s proposed Mars Telecommunications Orbiter is based on its Blue Ring spacecraft. The design combines hybrid solar-electric and chemical propulsion with 13 ports for mounting payloads, including scientific instruments and small spacecraft. Multiple Blue Ring vehicles are already in production, according to the source, and Blue Origin says it can produce four each year, with that rate scalable if required. Tory Bruno, president of Blue Origin’s national security arm, said the award reflected work on Blue Ring for this kind of mission and that both the company and its hardware were ready. The source does not report any change to the award following Rocket Lab’s protest.

IN NUMBERS
approximately $700 million
maximum reported value of Blue Origin’s Mars communications contract
13
payload-mounting ports on the Blue Ring design
$3.4 billion
value of Blue Origin’s 2023 Artemis lunar lander contract

Rocket Lab’s filing puts NASA’s eligibility requirements and assessment of its technical proposal before the GAO, while Blue Origin’s Mars communications award remains the selected outcome reported by the source.


Reported from theregister.com, 2026-09-14. The Tender Wire is published by Otnox.

Share This Article
Reports on procurement law, review decisions and how the rules change. Based in Warsaw.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *